Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 145
Filter
1.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 10(1)2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235739

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus, particularly affecting children, and can cause respiratory infections such as croup and bronchiolitis. The latter is a leading cause of paediatric hospitalisation within the UK. Children <3 years of age and/or with underlying health conditions are more vulnerable to severe RSV infection.There are currently limited data on the incidence of laboratory-confirmed RSV, particularly within primary care settings and outside the typical 'RSV season', which in the Northern hemisphere tends to coincide with winter months. There is also a lack of data on the health economic impact of RSV infection on families and healthcare systems.This observational surveillance study aims to collect data on the incidence of laboratory-confirmed RSV-attributable respiratory tract infection (RTI) in children aged <3 years presenting to primary, secondary or tertiary care; it also aims to estimate the health economic and quality of life impact of RSV-attributable infection in this cohort. Such data will contribute to informing public health strategies to prevent RSV-associated infection, including use of preventative medications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Parents/carers of children <3 years of age with RTI symptoms will consent for a respiratory sample (nasal swab) to be taken. Laboratory PCR testing will assess for the presence of RSV and/or other pathogens. Data will be obtained from medical records on demographics, comorbidities, severity of infection and hospitalisation outcomes. Parents will complete questionnaires on the impact of ongoing infection symptoms at day 14 and 28 following enrolment. The primary outcome is incidence of laboratory-confirmed RSV in children <3 years presenting to primary, secondary or tertiary care with RTI symptoms leading to health-seeking behaviours. Recruitment will be carried out from December 2021 to March 2023, encompassing two UK winter seasons and intervening months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted (21/WS/0142), and study findings will be published as per International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' guidelines.


Subject(s)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Tertiary Healthcare , Incidence , Quality of Life , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Wounds ; 35(6): 109-116, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233446

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 illness is associated with increased operative risks, ranging from delayed wound healing and coagulopathy to increased risk of mortality. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the authors' recent experience of the implications of COVID-19 on limb salvage procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LE limb salvage procedures within 30 days of a positive COVID-19 diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical factors, postoperative complications, and management were collected. RESULTS: Of 597 patients screened from February 2020 to March 2022, a total of 67 (11.2%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of which 17 received the diagnosis within 30 days of surgery and were thus included. Average follow-up was 43 ± 3.2 months, at which point 6 (35.3%) were fully healed. The mortality rate at the most recent follow-up visit was 29.4% of patients (n = 5). Two patients required admission to the SICU following index procedure, and 1 necessitated a return to the operating room. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 may negatively affect the wound healing process while increasing the mortality rate amongst patients with multiple or severe comorbidities undergoing limb salvage procedures. Medical providers need to be aware of the complexity of these patients and apply a multi-disciplinary protocol to obtain successful outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Limb Salvage , Humans , Limb Salvage/methods , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Testing , Tertiary Healthcare , Treatment Outcome , Ischemia/surgery , COVID-19/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) ; 81(2): 131-135, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2322141

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in new, non-orthopedic roles for many members of our New York City based orthopedic department, including redeployment to medicine wards, emergency departments, and intensive care units. The purpose of this study was to determine if certain areas of redeployment predisposed individuals to higher likelihood of positive diagnostic or serologic testing for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study, attendings, residents, and phy-sician assistants within our orthopedic department were surveyed to determine their roles during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether they were tested via diagnostic or serologic methods for detecting COVID-19. Additionally, symptoms and missed days of work were reported. RESULTS: No significant association between redeployment site and rate of positive COVID-19 diagnostic (p = 0.91) or serologic (p = 0.38) testing was detected. Sixty individuals responded to the survey, with 88.3% of respondents rede-ployed during the pandemic. Nearly half (n = 28) of those redeployed experienced at least one COVID-19 related symptom. Two respondents had a positive diagnostic test, and 10 had a positive serologic test. CONCLUSIONS: Area of redeployment during the COVID-19 pandemic is not associated with an increased risk of subse-quently having a positive diagnostic or serologic COVID-19 test.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthopedic Procedures , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , New York City/epidemiology , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects
4.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 56: 142-148, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319367

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There must be a perfect balance between Food and Dietary supplements (DS) to ensure optimal well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a webinar on the change in knowledge and attitude about the role of vitamins, minerals and DS among medical and nursing undergraduates so that they could bring about a positive change in popular practices, as well-informed Health Care Professionals (HCPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional analytical study comprising 12 knowledge and 11 attitude questions administered to medical and nursing undergraduates with the help of semi-structured and pre-validated google form both before and after a webinar explaining the role of key nutrients and also the evidence and recommendations surrounding DS. Data were analyzed using STATA.12 to assess the impact of the webinar. RESULTS: There were 415 participants, with 265 medical and 150 nursing students. There was a significant improvement both in the knowledge (4.95 (±1.45), 7.76 (±1.69) and attitude scores (pre-webinar mean score 31.8 (±5.57) post-webinar mean score 27.7 (±4.90))of the participants after the webinar. An overall positive correlation before the webinar changed to a more significant negative correlation, indicating a positive impact of the webinar (0.0054-0.0701). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that continuing education informing various HCPs and undergraduate students about the absolute necessity of a diet rich in nutrients, vitamins, minerals, and probiotics is the need of the hour. Additionally, the efficacy and safety concerns, appropriate indications and dosages of various DS should be adequately stressed so that informed decisions can be made. Such training programs might have a far-reaching impact on the nutrition choices of the population at large.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vitamins , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Dietary Supplements , Minerals , Students , Vitamin A , Vitamin K , Hospitals, Teaching
5.
Ann Afr Med ; 22(2): 176-182, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298291

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19 infection has a myriad of presentation. Rural India and other developing nations are relatively resource poor, not having access to modern specialized investigations. In this study, we tried to evaluate only biochemical parameters in predicting the severity of the infection. The aim of this study was to find a cost-effective means to predict the clinical course at the time of admission and thereby to reduce mortality and, if possible, morbidity by timely intervention. Materials and Methods: All COVID-19-positive cases admitted at our hospital from March 21 to December 31, 2020, were recruited in this study. The same acted as sham control at recovery. Results: We observed a significant difference in biochemical parameters at the time of admission and discharge, between mild/moderate disease and severe disease. We found slightly deranged liver function tests at admission, which becomes normal at the time of discharge. Urea, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase, and ferritin concentrations in severe/critical patients were significantly higher than that in the mild/moderate group. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to predict the severity on the basis of biochemical parameters independently, of the patients based on these values. Conclusion: We proposed cutoff values of certain biochemical parameters, which will help in judging the severity of the infection at admission. We developed a predictive model with a significant predictive capability for CRP and ferritin values, using normal available biochemical parameters, routinely done in resource-poor centers. Clinicians working in resource-poor situations will be benefitted by having an idea of the severity of the disease. Timely intervention will reduce mortality and severe morbidity.


Résumé Introduction: L'infection au COVID19 a une myriade de présentations. L'Inde rurale et d'autres pays en développement sont relativement pauvres en ressources, non avoir accès aux enquêtes spécialisées modernes. Dans cette étude, nous avons essayé d'évaluer uniquement les paramètres biochimiques pour prédire la gravité de l'infection. Le but de cette étude était de trouver un moyen rentable de prédire l'évolution clinique au moment de l'admission et ainsi de réduire la mortalité et, si possible, la morbidité par une intervention rapide. Matériels et méthodes: Tous les cas positifs au COVID19 admis à notre hospitalisés du 21 mars au 31 décembre 2020, ont été recrutés dans cette étude. La même chose a agi comme un contrôle factice lors de la récupération. Résultats: Nous avons observé une différence significative dans les paramètres biochimiques au moment de l'admission et de la sortie, entre une maladie légère/modérée et une maladie grave. Nous avons trouvé des tests de la fonction hépatique légèrement dérangés à l'admission, qui deviennent normaux au moment de la sortie. Urée, protéine Créactive (CRP, les concentrations de procalcitonine, de lactate déshydrogénase et de ferritine chez les patients sévères/critiques étaient significativement plus élevées que chez les patients légers/modérés groupe. Les courbes caractéristiques de fonctionnement du récepteur ont été tracées pour prédire la gravité sur la base de paramètres biochimiques indépendamment, deles patients en fonction de ces valeurs. Conclusion: Nous avons proposé des valeurs seuils de certains paramètres biochimiques, qui permettront de juger de la gravité de l'infection à l'admission. Nous avons développé un modèle prédictif avec une capacité prédictive significative pour les valeurs de CRP et de ferritine, en utilisant les paramètres biochimiques normaux disponibles, systématiquement effectués dans les centres pauvres en ressources. Les cliniciens travaillant dans des situations où les ressources sont limitées bénéficier d'avoir une idée de la gravité de la maladie. Une intervention rapide réduira la mortalité et la morbidité grave. Mots-clés: COVID19, ferritine, lactate déshydrogénase, urée.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Hospitals , Ferritins , Retrospective Studies
6.
Indian J Public Health ; 67(1): 35-40, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293353

ABSTRACT

Background: Medical education is recognized as stressful globally. COVID-19 pandemic is an additional source of anxiety to the medical students. Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the prevalence and to identify the factors associated with anxiety due to COVID-19 among undergraduate medical students in a teaching hospital of Kolkata, West Bengal. . Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted among 363 undergraduate medical students using the stratified random sampling of a medical college from June to July 2021. Data were collected using a predesigned, pretested, and structured online questionnaire, including "Coronavirus Anxiety Scale." Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the prevalence of anxiety. Pearson's Chi-square test was performed to find out the factors associated with anxiety due to COVID-19. Results: About 25.6% of the medical students were found to have anxiety due to COVID-19. About 28.9% of them reported COVID-19 infection in family in recent past and 11.0% had themselves tested positive. Nearly 20% reported loss of family members, relatives, and close friends due to COVID-19. The factors associated with anxiety due to pandemic were socioeconomic status, social stigma, sleep disturbances, history of COVID-19 in family, loss of job. and vaccination status of family members missing practical classes and exam-related anxiety. Conclusion: The study found that one-fourth of the medical students had anxiety due to COVID-19. Social stigma due to COVID-19 and loss of job of parents were the most significant predictors. It is recommended that targeted psychological and clinical interventions need to be taken to alleviate students' anxiety due to COVID.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare , India/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology
7.
Braz Oral Res ; 37: 025, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287131

ABSTRACT

The pandemic caused by coronavirus has resonated throughout different levels of health care in Brazil and, in this context, the present research aimed to evaluate this impact on tertiary dental care provided by the Unified Health System (SUS). Therefore, an ecological study was conducted with data obtained from the Hospital Information System processed by the Portal of the Department of Informatics of SUS. The sample consisted of patients of all sexes and age groups, whose Hospital Admission Authorizations (AIHs) were approved for dental tertiary care procedures from January 2015 to December 2020. Descriptive analyses and the ANOVA test with a significance level set at p < 0.05 were used. When the annual mean numbers of AIHs approved were evaluated, findings showed that on an average, the Southeast region authorized a higher number of procedures (p-value < 0.001), however, in the pandemic year (2020), a reduction of approximately 24.5% of these hospitalizations occurred throughout Brazil, with the Midwest being the region most affected (32.12%). A percentage increase occurred in the Surgical Treatment of Oral sinus/Oral nasal Fistula (16.1%), in addition to a significant decrease in performing procedures for Resection of Mouth Lesion (33.4%). In the pandemic year, there was a reduction of 14% in expenditures related to hospital services and 23.26% related to professional services. It was concluded that the data presented demonstrated a significant reduction in AIHs for tertiary dental care in the pandemic year.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare , Brazil , Dental Care
8.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(6): 1236-1240, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although Dermatology is largely considered an outpatient specialty, there is an increasing need for Dermatology input in the acute and inpatient setting. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dermatology services had to be reorganized to facilitate staff redeployment and minimize the risk of exposure to COVID-19 for patients and staff. This led to an unprecedented increase in teleconsultations aided by clinical images. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of our retrospective study was to analyse the acute Dermatology referrals received in the pre-COVID-19 era and during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed acute Dermatology referrals using the acute referral log. RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 500 and 110 acute Dermatology referrals received in the pre-COVID-19 period and during COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. In the pre-COVID-19 era, consultations were most commonly requested by Oncology/Haemato-Oncology, Emergency Departments and General Practice, while during the COVID-19 pandemic General Practice was the most common source of referrals. A wide variety of dermatological conditions were encountered with the most common been eczematous dermatoses. CONCLUSIONS: Although Dermatology is largely an outpatient-based specialty, this study shows the demand for urgent Dermatology input the care of sick patients with severe skin diseases and in the management of skin problems in patients admitted or receiving treatment for other diseases. Re-organization of Dermatology services during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a marked increase in teleconsultations (28% versus 84.5%) and highlighted the importance of complete skin-directed physical examination by the referring clinician as well as procurement of good quality clinical images.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatology , Remote Consultation , Skin Diseases , Humans , Hospitals , London , Pandemics , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/therapy , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Tertiary Healthcare
9.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 17(3): e13102, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2255238

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the epidemiology of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in children. The aims of the present study were to describe the epidemiological trend of ARI emergency visits and virology results prior and after the SARS-CoV-2 emergence and to estimate the association of ARI emergency department (ED) visits with respiratory viruses. Methods: This study was conducted at the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, a tertiary care children's hospital in the Lazio Region, Italy. The demographic and clinical information of children who accessed the ED and were diagnosed with ARI from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022 was retrospectively extracted from the electronic health records. The observed temporal trends in viruses diagnosed from respiratory samples were compared with the number of ARI ED visits over the same period through a multivariable linear regression model. Results: During the study period, there were 72,959 ED admissions for ARIs and 33,355 respiratory samples resulted positive for viruses. Prior to the pandemic, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza had a clear seasonal pattern, which was interrupted in 2020. In 2021-2022, RSV reached the highest peak observed during the study period, whereas influenza activity was minimal. The peaks of ARI ED visits corresponded to peaks of influenza, RSV, and rhinovirus in the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons, to SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus in 2020, and to RSV and parainfluenza in 2021-2022. Conclusions: ARI resulting in ED visits should be included in the ARI disease burden measurement for a more accurate measure of the impact of preventive measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Child , Humans , Infant , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Hospitals , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology
10.
Viruses ; 14(2)2022 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285589

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of the study was to estimate the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among HCWs in Cochabamba, Bolivia and to determine the potential risk factors. In January 2021, a cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study was conducted in 783 volunteer clinical and non-clinical HCWs in tertiary care facilities. It was based on IgG detection using ELISA, chemiluminiscence, and seroneutralisation tests from dried blood spots. Analysis revealed a high seroprevalence (43.4%) of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. The combination of anosmia and ageusia (OR: 68.11; 95%-CI 24.83-186.80) was predictive of seropositivity. Belonging to the cleaning staff (OR: 1.94; 95%-CI 1.09-3.45), having more than two children in the same house (OR: 1.74; 95%-CI 1.12-2.71), and having been in contact with a close relative with COVID-19 (OR: 3.53; 95%-CI 2.24-5.58) were identified as risk factors for seropositivity in a multivariate analysis. A total of 47.5% of participants had received medication for COVID-19 treatment or prevention, and only ~50% of symptomatic subjects accessed PCR or antigenic testing. This study confirms a massive SARS-CoV-2 attack rate among HCWs in Cochabamba by the end of January 2021. The main risk factors identified are having a low-skilled job, living with children, and having been in contact with an infected relative in the household.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Bolivia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
11.
J Trop Pediatr ; 69(2)2023 02 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285402

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to document the chest X-ray findings in children with COVID-19 pneumonia. The secondary aim is to correlate chest X-ray findings to patient outcome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of children (0-18 years) with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to December 2021. The chest radiographs were assessed for: peribronchial cuffing, ground-glass opacities (GGOs), consolidation, pulmonary nodules and pleural effusion. The severity of the pulmonary findings was graded using a modification of the Brixia score. RESULTS: There were a total of 90 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection; the mean age was 5.8 years (age range 7 days to 17 years). Abnormalities were seen on the CXR in 74 (82%) of the 90 patients. Bilateral peribronchial cuffing was seen in 68% (61/90), consolidation in 11% (10/90), bilateral central GGOs in 2% (2/90) and unilateral pleural effusion in 1% (1/90). Overall the average CXR score in our cohort of patients was 6. The average CXR score in patients with oxygen requirement was 10. The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in those patients with CXR score >9. CONCLUSION: The CXR score has the potential to serve as tool to identify children at high risk and may aid planning of clinical management in such patients.


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) created a global pandemic in early March 2020. There are very few studies describing the lung changes in affected children. We performed a retrospective study in children, aged between 0 days and 18 years, who tested positive for this virus. This study was conducted in a paediatric tertiary care hospital in South India. Chest X-ray (CXR) was done in children with moderate and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection; these X-rays were reviewed and scoring was done to assess the degree of abnormality. It was seen that the duration of hospital stay was longer in children with a high CXR score. Amongst the children with score >9, 60% needed oxygen support during their treatment. Thus, CXR score can play a role in the prediction of disease outcome in SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pleural Effusion , Humans , Child , Infant, Newborn , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, Pediatric , Tertiary Healthcare , Radiography, Thoracic , Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pleural Effusion/etiology , Lung
12.
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care ; 22: 23259582231159093, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248274

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients' satisfaction is an important indicator of determining the quality of pharmaceutical care (PC). This study investigated Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) patients' satisfaction with PC at Federal Medical Centre, Keffi-Nigeria and determined the statistical correlation between the respondents' socio-demographic variables and their satisfaction with PC. Methods: This cross-sectional survey study involved 351 randomly selected HIV-positive patients receiving PC in the facility. A Likert-type questionnaire was used for the data collection. Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was .916. The "overall perception of pharmacists' care or service" had a mean satisfaction score of 4.24 ± 0.749 and "the amount of time spent with the pharmacists" had a mean score of 3.94 ± 0.791. No significant association was found between socio-demographic variables and overall patients' satisfaction with PC. Conclusion: The reliability of the questionnaire was high and the HIV patients had a good satisfaction with the PC they received in the facility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Pharmaceutical Services , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , HIV , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , Tertiary Healthcare
13.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health ; 36(1): 139-150, 2023 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238849

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare workers' (HCWs) health and wellbeing. Most studies on COVID-19 have focused on tertiary healthcare. The aim of this study was to increase the knowledge on the effects of the pandemic on working conditions in tertiary and primary healthcare. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The comparative cross-sectional study consisted of an online questionnaire sent to HCWs of the City of Helsinki (primary healthcare) and Helsinki University Hospital (tertiary healthcare). Altogether 1580 HCWs with direct patient contact participated in the study: 895 from tertiary and 685 from primary healthcare. Statistical analysis used SPSS 25 from IBM. The tests used were the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Primary HCWs were less likely to treat COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.56). However, both groups reported a similar number of COVID-19 infections, primary HCWs 4.9% and tertiary HCWs 5.0%, and workrelated quarantine was significantly more prevalent (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38-2.79) among primary HCWs. In addition, work-related wellbeing was poorer among primary HCWs than tertiary HCWs in terms of feeling more stressed at work (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.55-4.02), not recovering from work (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39-0.62), reported mental wellbeing below normal levels (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.26-2.00), and increased working hours (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates how the pandemic has affected the wellbeing and working conditions of not only tertiary but also less studied primary HCWs. The authors' findings suggest that the challenges identified during the COVID-19 pandemic in the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers are even greater in primary care than in tertiary care. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):139-50.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare , SARS-CoV-2 , Working Conditions , Health Personnel
14.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 42: 12-16, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2232897

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is still considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, due to several limitations, use of RT-qPCR is limited in a resource poor setting like North East India. Rapid antigen detection testing kit has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in India. However, conflicting reports exist regarding the efficacy of the kits for diagnosis of COVID-19. This study aims to highlight the performance of Standard Q COVID-19® Antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor) compared with RT-qPCR in the setup of North East India. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples were collected from consenting patients attending the flu clinic in the period from 1st July to December 31, 2020. Samples were transferred to Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for RT-qPCR test. Antigen detection from the patient samples were undertaken using Standard Q ® COVID-19 antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor, Republic of Korea). Data were then analyzed for comparison between RT-qPCR and antigen kit results. RESULTS: During the study period, 189 samples were collected, out of which 119 were positive by RT-qPCR. Out of 119 positive samples, calculated sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen kit was 63% and 100% respectively. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy increases in symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients. Cohen's Kappa coefficient showed a moderate association (0.6) between the kit and RT-qPCR test. The kit performed optimally at a CT value of ≤32.5 for N gene with a predicted sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 93.3%. CONCLUSION: The study shows an overall acceptable sensitivity and specificity of the testing kit, with a better performance in symptomatic patients. The association of the kit result is moderate with the results obtained in RT-qPCR. In this study, the rapid antigen test kit performed optimally at N gene qRT PCR cut off value of ≤32.5.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Tertiary Healthcare , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Natl Med J India ; 35(3): 147-152, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2156078

ABSTRACT

Background The Covid-19 pandemic caused a rapidly evolving and confused situation. Health sciences students (HSSs) are not immune to depression, anxiety and stress during such a pandemic. We aimed to assess the relation between depression, anxiety, stress and resilience among undergraduate HSSs during the Covid-19 lockdown. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey at a rural tertiary healthcare centre in Maharashtra. Data were recorded from study participants on sociodemographic details using the 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). Data were analysed using SPSS software version 15.0. Results A total of 381 students participated in the online survey. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress were 7.6%, 6.3% and 1.0%, respectively. There was a positive correlation between all three sub-scales of DASS-21. On BRS, 5 (1.3%) participants had high resilience, 216 (56.7%) had normal resilience and 160 (42.0%) had low resilience. Those respondents who had high resilience had lower rates of depression, anxiety and stress on DASS-21 sub-scales. Conclusion A proportion of HSSs had anxiety, depression and stress during the Covid-19 outbreak and lockdown. Respondents with high resilience had less frequent depression, anxiety and stress. In the long run, strengthening resilience of HSSs may be useful.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Depression/epidemiology , Tertiary Healthcare , Communicable Disease Control , India/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Students
17.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(3): 302-308, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2159286

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the characteristics and clinical course of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) according to the healthcare level of the admitted hospital, to provide an insight into determining the appropriate level of care for each patient. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study utilized data from the COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP), the largest Japanese registry of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Datasets were obtained from reports filed as of May 31, 2022. RESULTS: A total of 59,707 patients (2004 in the primary care group, 41,420 in the secondary care group, and 16,283 in the tertiary care group) from 585 facilities were included in the analysis. Patients with established risk factors for severe disease, such as old age and the presence of comorbidities, were treated at higher care facilities and had poorer initial conditions and in-hospital clinical course, as well as higher mortality. Analysis of the fatality rates for each complication suggested that patients with complications requiring procedures (e.g. pleural effusions, myocardial ischemia, and arrhythmia) may have better survival rates in facilities with specialist availability. The number of deaths and severe COVID-19 cases in this study were notably less than those reported overseas. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that more difficult COVID-19 cases with poor outcomes were treated at higher care level facilities in Japan. Attending to possible complications may be useful for selecting an appropriate treatment hospital. Healthcare providers need to maintain a broad perspective on the distribution of medical resources.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Disease Progression , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Japan/epidemiology
18.
Indian J Public Health ; 66(Supplement): S76-S79, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2144161

ABSTRACT

Background: The emergence of COVID-19 and its consequences is causing widespread fears, anxiety, and worries. To overcome the transmission of COVID-19, people resorted to compulsive behaviors. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCSs) due to COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of level of fear due to COVID-19 pandemic, and to assess the factors associated with OCSs due to COVID-19 pandemic among the undergraduate medical students of in tertiary unit in Southern India. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in 250 undergraduate medical students (both MBBS and BDS, from 1st to 4th year) in the institute. Students who had consented in the study were included as study participants. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale and Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19 S) were used in assessing OCSs and the level of fear due to COVID-19. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression were used to compute the factors associated with OCS. Results: The mean age of the respondents was 21 ± 1.313 years. The prevalence of OCS in undergraduate medical students was 36 (14.4%), and the level of FCV-19 was 107 (42.8%). Male students (17.8%, 44.2%) had higher OCSs and levels of fear as compared to female students (13.6%, 42.4%). Students with FCV-19 were three (adjusted odds ratio-3.418, 95% confidence interval-1.596, 7.319) times more likely to manifest OCSs while factors such as age, gender, and course were not significantly associated with OCS. Conclusion: Psychological counseling for undergraduate students should be pivotal, especially during pandemics and outbreaks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Students, Medical , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Prevalence , Pandemics , Tertiary Healthcare , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/epidemiology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnosis , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , India/epidemiology , Fear
19.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 1014, 2022 Nov 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2139246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty procedures in low-income countries are mostly performed at tertiary centers, with waiting lists exceeding 12 to 24 months. Recently, this is further exacerbated by the impact of the Covid Pandemic on elective surgeries. Providing arthroplasty services at other levels of healthcare aims to offset this burden, however there is a marked paucity of literature regarding surgical outcomes. This study aims to provide evidence on the safety of arthroplasty at district level. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive hip and knee primary arthroplasty cases performed at a District Hospital (DH), and a Tertiary Academic Hospital (TH) in Cape Town, South Africa between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, surgery related readmissions, reoperations, post-operative complications, and mortality rates were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Seven hundred and ninety-five primary arthroplasty surgeries were performed at TH level and 228 at DH level. The average hospital stay was 5.2 ± 2.0 days at DH level and 7.6 ± 7.1 days for TH (p < 0.05). Readmissions within 3 months post-surgery of 1.75% (4 patients) for district and 4.40% (35) for tertiary level (p < 0.05). Reoperation rate of 1 in every 100 patients at the DH and 8.3 in every 100 patients at the TH (p < 0.05). Death rate was 0.4% vs 0.6% at district and tertiary hospitals respectively (p > 0.05). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate was 0.43% at DH and 2.26% at TH. The percentage of hip dislocation requiring revision was 0% at district and 0.37% at tertiary level. During the study period, 228 patients received their arthroplasty surgery at the DH; these patients would otherwise have remained on the TH waiting list. CONCLUSIONS: Hip and Knee Arthroplasty at District health care level is safe and; for the reason that the DH feeds into the TH; providing arthroplasty at district level may help ease the pressure on arthroplasty services at tertiary care facilities in a Southern African context. Adequately trained surgeons should be encouraged to perform these procedures in district hospitals provided there is appropriate patient selection and adherence to strict theatre operating procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective cohort study.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , COVID-19 , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , South Africa/epidemiology
20.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(19)2022 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2065968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major public health concern worldwide. Latin America has experienced rapid growth in obesity incidence during the last few decades. Driven by confinement measures, a telemedicine program was implemented in March 2020 to give continuity to obese patients' care through a weight loss program led by the endocrinology department in a tertiary care medical center in Latin America. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the clinical experience of using digital health for monitoring and attention of obese patients and description of weight change outcomes of these patients followed via telemedicine during March 2020-December 2020. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 202 patients. A Skillings-Mack test was performed to conduct a subgroup analysis of the medians of the weight over the follow-up period, and a mixed multiple linear regression model was performed to estimate the expected average change in weight over time Results: We observed good adherence to the program, represented by a weight loss of -4.1 kg at three months of follow-up, which was maintained even during the sixth month of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Digital Health strategies such as telemedicine can be a helpful tool for both patients and health care providers to support the continuity of care and showing satisfactory results in the management of obese patients.


Subject(s)
Obesity , Telemedicine , Humans , Latin America , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Telemedicine/methods , Tertiary Healthcare
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL